X corporation sues Y and Z corporation. It asserts that Y and Z corporations have violated the federal government's antitrust laws by conspiring to prevent it from selling its widgets to supermarkets in North Carolina. It devotes 10 paragraphs full of detailed allegations to explaining why the federal antitrust law was violated. It also brings a North Carolina Unfair Practices Act claim, arguing in 2 paragraphs in the complaint that Y and Z corporation engaged in illegal practices in convincing North Carolina supermarkets not to carry its widgets. Y and Z corporation file a motion to dismiss the North Carolina Unfair Practices Act claim for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. All parties are domiciled in N.C. Under Gibbs, what result?A.There is jurisdiction because the plaintiff filed both together in federal court.B.There is no jurisdiction.C.There is no jurisdiction because the state law claim is insubstantial relative to the federal claim.D.There is jurisdiction because the state law claim comes from a common nucleus of operative facts with the federal claim.

Then try StudyFetch, the AI-powered platform that can answer your questions and teach you more about it!