
Do you need help with
An ecologist, a citizen of State A, sued a cab driver, a citizen of State B, in the federal district court in State C. The ecologist is seeking $77,000 in damages for tortious injuries caused by the cab driver's allegedly negligent driving while the ecologist and cab driver were in State D. The cab driver was served with process while on vacation in State C, in accordance with State C law.What is cab driver's strongest argument against litigating the case in State C?A court should dismiss lawsuit because it does not have subject-matter jurisdiction over the cause of action.B court should dismiss lawsuit because it does not have personal jurisdiction over the cab driver.C court should transfer the lawsuit to a State D state court because it is inconvenient for the cab driver to litigate in State C.D court should dismiss the lawsuit because State C is not a proper venue to litigate the cause of action.
Then try StudyFetch, the AI-powered platform that can answer your questions and teach you more about it!


How StudyFetch Helps You Master This Topic
AI-Powered Explanations
Get in-depth, personalized explanations on this topic and related concepts, tailored to your learning style.
Practice Tests
Take adaptive quizzes that focus on your weak areas and help reinforce your understanding of the subject.
Interactive Flashcards
Review key concepts and terms with AI-generated flashcards, optimizing your retention and recall.
Educational Games
Engage with fun, interactive games that reinforce your learning and make studying more enjoyable.
Start mastering this topic and many others with StudyFetch's comprehensive learning tools.